Posts Tagged ‘feminism’

Uncommon Arrangements

January 15th, 2010

Uncommon Arrangements

Don’t you always wonder what REALLY goes in another marriage.  Sometimes, I look at a couple, usually a celebrity couple, and think, “how on earth do they stay together?”

If you feel the same way, be sure to pick up Uncommon Arrangements: Seven Portraits of Married Life in London Literary Circles, 1910-1939. Don’t let the long title scare you off.  This is biographical writing at its best.  Katie Roiphe, who writes on women’s issues for The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Slate, has thoroughly researched the lives of seven famous couples.  She’s then taken all that research and turned it into insightful, interesting reading.  In fact, I devoured much of the book in one setting Sunday afternoon.

For each couple, Roiphe opens with a moment of crisis in their relationship.  She begins with H.G. Wells, author of War of the Worlds, and his wife, Jane Wells.  The moment is the birth of his illegitimate child, whose mother is the prominent, young feminist, Rebecca West.  Much of the chapter is told from the point of view of Wells and West, whose affair was known by all involved.  However, during the final pages Roiphe turns her attention to Jane.  Roiphe examines her writing and uncovers a much more nuanced reading of how Jane must have felt in the situation.

My favorite chapter is on Vanessa Bell, Virginia Woolf’s sister.  An artist, and the center of the famed  “Bloomsbury” group, Vanessa managed to carry on multiple affairs, yet still remain friends with all involved.  Roiphe begins Vanessa’s chapter with a dinner where three men, including her husband, all sit at her table.  Roiphe explores how Vanessa was able to maintain the delicate balance between all these relationships.  However, just as one comes to admire Vanessa and her tribe for their honesty, Roiphe turns the tables by investigating how Vanessa’s children reacted to their upbringing.  While the adults all felt that they were forging new kinds of relationships, their children were reared in an oddly Victorian atmosphere where none of them knew what was happening between their parents.

Roiphe sifts through mountains of material to create vivid depictions of each marriage from multiple perspectives.  While it’s true that no one will ever really know what happens behind closed doors, Roiphe is able to take the volumes of letters, diaries, and essays written by these people to craft tantalizing glimpses of what it must have been like to feel that the world was new and the rules waited to be written.

All We Ever Wanted Was Everything

August 5th, 2009

All We Ever Wanted Was EverythingI’m not entirely sure how I feel about the recent rescessionista trend in chick lit.  Yes, times are tough, and we should thoughtfully examine the folly and excesses of the recent past.  However, I can do that by reading the news, listening to NPR’s Planet Money series, or reading serious analysis by economists.  When I pick up a book with high heels on the cover or a frothy ice cream sundae, I’m looking to escape and relax.  I want detailed descriptions and likeable characters that transport me to a life an awful lot like mine, but also just a little bit more luxurious.  I don’t really want a critique of the dark, hollow center of the American Dream.

I knew going in that All We Ever Wanted Was Everything by Janelle Brown was satire, so I was prepared to put aside my typical chick lit desires and get a bit of a lecture.  Fortunately, Brown’s writing is more complex than that.  She also fulfilled enough of my desire for pleasure to make the book enjoyable, especially with an early description of a decadent $900 dinner in L.A.  In the novel, the main character, Janice, is about to watch her ship sail in.  She grew up poor, but she married young, and her husband has risen up the corporate ranks.  Now, he is about to release an IPO that will put their net worth in the hundreds of millions of dollars.  Sadly, the very day he does so, he also sends Janice a certified letter asking for a divorce.  Meanwhile, Janice’s 28-year old daughter, Margaret, is flailing in L.A.  She’s been dumped by her newly minted movie star boyfriend and has $100,000 in credit card debt for her failed feminist ‘zine, Snatch.  Janice’s other daughter, Lizzie, is 14 and has recently been labeled the class slut.

Clearly, Brown has her work cut out to make these characters likeable.  All three have put aside their own ambitions to trail men.  All three are now down and out.  While I wanted to slap Janice around once or twice and shout “snap out of it!”, she was a well-developed character.  In the end, she was quite sympathetic.  My favorite character was Margaret, the failed writer.  Through her, Brown gets to make fun of the sort of musty feminism that often floats around in academic circles.  I especially liked all the descriptions of Margaret’s magazine.  I’m pretty sure I read something just like that in the late ’90s.  The pacing of the book dragged just a bit in the second half for me, but, overall, it satisfied my chick lit criteria and made me think a little bit about the dark, hollow center of both the American Dream and feminism. . .no easy task!

Have you read anything that you’d class as recessionista lit lately?  What did you tihnk of it?

A Girl’s Guide to Modern European Philosophy

June 29th, 2009

A Girl's Guide to Modern European PhilosophyAt first, I was seriously offended by the title: A Girl’s Guide to Modern European Philosophy.  Come on, women are perfectly capable of studying philosophy; we don’t need to be lured in with a cornball title.  When I read The Literate Housewife’s review and discovered that this was a novel, I was immediately reassured.  It’s interesting how I segregate my academic reading from my entertainment.  Once I knew which category this one fell into, I was amused, rather than offended, by the title.

Charlotte Greig’s debut novel was slow going at first, but quickly turned into a wonderful read.   The opening section relied heavily on quotes from Nietzsche.  Since I never warmed up to Nietzsche and tend to use him as a punch line more than anything else, I worried that this book would be a terrible blend of two incompatible genres.  Happily, I had it all wrong.  Greig cleverly manages to weave three heavyweight philosophers, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Kierkegaard, into chick lit in such a way that the philosophers are the ones who end up looking a little shallow.

The heroine, Susannah, is a college student, who is studying philosophy in 1970s Sussex.  In the first section of the novel, she faces the typical heroine’s dilemma: choosing between two men. One is the older, more stable career man, while the other is the youthful, free-spirited classmate.  It’s pretty easy to see the flaws in each, and I wondered how Greig would sustain the dramatic tension through the remaining two-thirds of the book.  Fortunately, she introduces a twist in the second section — an unplanned pregnancy.  The choice shifts from which man to pick to whether or not to have the baby.  Suddenly, Susannah needs her Modern European philosophers to help her struggle with this difficult decision.  Greig cleverly turns what had seemed like window dressing — Susannah’s choice of major — into a feminist critique of the all-too masculine discipline of philosophy. I loved how Susannah deliberately wrestles with the great thinkers as she contemplates her predicament, modelling how any one of us could soundly approach life’s biggest decisions.

If you’re looking for something to read that is entertaining without insulting your intelligence, Greig’s first novel is an excellent choice.  Here’s to hoping it is the first of many!

Bad Mother

June 22nd, 2009

Bad MotherAs Bad Mother: A Chronicle of Maternal Crimes, Minor Calamities, and Occasional Moments of Grace made the publicity rounds, I caught an interview with Aylet Waldman on Fresh AirI was immediately captivated by Waldman’s candor and sense of humor.  Of course, I was also a bit jealous of her life.  Married to the novelist, Michael Chabon, Waldman is able to juggle child care and writing to create a thoroughly satisfying life.  However, some people aren’t nearly as inspired as I am.  The title for her memoir was sparked by the backlash Waldman endured after writing, in an article for the New York Times, that she loved her husband more than her children. Actually, that’s not quite right.  What she really said was that she was in love with her husband in a way that she never would be with her children.

My first thought was, “exactly!”  If you don’t sustain the love that brought the two of you together as a couple, how can you happily raise children?  Unlike many of those who reacted vehemently and told Waldman that she was a horrible woman, I silently agreed that she was right on the mark. Of course, those naysayers would tell me that’s because I don’t have my own children.  It’s true that I don’t have any biological children, but I do have two incredible role models:  my mom and my step-dad, who are still openly in love after twenty-five years of marriage. In fact, all of my friends commented about how adorable my parents were, laughing and dancing, at my wedding.  My husband and I were so happy watching my parents celebrate their love and life together as we celebrated the beginning of our own journey together.

However you may feel about Waldman’s essay in the Times, I think this is a wonderful memoir to read if you are parenting.  Waldman shares the highs and lows of her life with four children.  Not only does Waldman write honestly about her individual choices, but she also analyzes the increasingly intense pressure that mothers face. Drawing on the reactions she received after publishing her essay and the growing “mommy” corner of the web, Waldman demonstrates a new (or perhaps very old, just newly packaged) stereotype of the “bad mother.”  What’s fascinating is how people don’t want to separate the countless decisions mothers must make from the whole, individual woman. Instead of discussing decisions within their contexts, it’s easier to just slap on the “good mother” or “bad mother” label.  Waldman shows how such black and white thinking harms women who internalize the dichotomy.   In this beautifully crafted memoir, Waldman shares her warmth and her humor to help us all understand how many shades of gray there really are when it comes to raising children.

The Feminine Mistake

June 8th, 2009

The Feminine MistakeThe Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Muchby Leslie Bennets came out in 2007.  Last week, I stumbled across it while browsing at my local library.  I wish I had read it when it was first released.  Around my 30th birthday, I was obsessed by anything related to the so-called “Mommy Wars”  (I seriously hate that label, so this is the only time I’ll use it in this post).  I wasn’t even married, but the ticking of that dreaded biological clock suddenly kicked in.  I read every polemic I could find, from Judith Warner’s Perfect Madness to Sylvia Ann Hewlett’s Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest for Children.  All these books did was reinforce my fears that I would never marry nor have a child.  I wish that Bennets had published her defense of working mothers during my birthday obsession.

Bennetts, a successful journalist and contributing editor for Vanity Fair, is the sensible champion of the working mother.  Granted, hers has been a life of relative privilege, and many of the women she interviews have stable, challenging, and interesting careers.  However, she balances her anecdotes with hard data and interviews with women across the socio-economic spectrum.  Bennetts argues for what I have long believed: working mothers are often good wives, good mothers, and healthy, happy women.

As Bennetts acknowledges, every situation is unique.  Since most of us do not have optimal support for raising children, I would never dream to decide how other women should raise their children.  However, for anyone trying to decide how to juggle motherhood and a career, Bennets offers several convincing arguments for NOT sacrificing one’s career to raise small children. In her view, it is important to take the long view.  A typical woman can work anywhere between thirty and fifty years.  During these years, her income, benefits, and job opportunities can all increase.  Women who hop off the career track for five to ten years to raise small children lose the benefits of consistent salary increases and 401(k) contributions.  Bennetts demonstrates how many women have a difficult time re-entering the workplace and never recover from the economic sacrifices they have made.  She does offer concrete advice for women who do want to opt out for several years and re-enter their careers.  Yet, Bennetts also illustrates what happens to some women who depend on their husbands for support; they can be left financially vulnerable and without good career options if their marriages disintegrate.

What impressed me the most was Bennett’s arguments for the benefits of work. I agree that women who work only for the paycheck may long for the luxury of a stay-at-home lifestyle.  However, those of us who are fortunate enough to love what we do derive many intangible benefits from work.  I know that I have grown and matured through the rigors of graduate school and the daily challenges of the classroom.  Bennetts realizes that many working women have been so defensive and worried about their life choices that they rarely take the time to describe the positives that come from a solid career.

While I wouldn’t say this book is the definitive answer to the incredibly difficult choices women face when it comes to balancing work and family, I would recommend it to anyone who is considering how to make the choice for herself.

How about you?  Any good books you’d recommend to women who are deciding how to balance career and family?