Posts Tagged ‘Non-Fiction’

Uncommon Arrangements

January 15th, 2010

Uncommon Arrangements

Don’t you always wonder what REALLY goes in another marriage.  Sometimes, I look at a couple, usually a celebrity couple, and think, “how on earth do they stay together?”

If you feel the same way, be sure to pick up Uncommon Arrangements: Seven Portraits of Married Life in London Literary Circles, 1910-1939. Don’t let the long title scare you off.  This is biographical writing at its best.  Katie Roiphe, who writes on women’s issues for The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Slate, has thoroughly researched the lives of seven famous couples.  She’s then taken all that research and turned it into insightful, interesting reading.  In fact, I devoured much of the book in one setting Sunday afternoon.

For each couple, Roiphe opens with a moment of crisis in their relationship.  She begins with H.G. Wells, author of War of the Worlds, and his wife, Jane Wells.  The moment is the birth of his illegitimate child, whose mother is the prominent, young feminist, Rebecca West.  Much of the chapter is told from the point of view of Wells and West, whose affair was known by all involved.  However, during the final pages Roiphe turns her attention to Jane.  Roiphe examines her writing and uncovers a much more nuanced reading of how Jane must have felt in the situation.

My favorite chapter is on Vanessa Bell, Virginia Woolf’s sister.  An artist, and the center of the famed  “Bloomsbury” group, Vanessa managed to carry on multiple affairs, yet still remain friends with all involved.  Roiphe begins Vanessa’s chapter with a dinner where three men, including her husband, all sit at her table.  Roiphe explores how Vanessa was able to maintain the delicate balance between all these relationships.  However, just as one comes to admire Vanessa and her tribe for their honesty, Roiphe turns the tables by investigating how Vanessa’s children reacted to their upbringing.  While the adults all felt that they were forging new kinds of relationships, their children were reared in an oddly Victorian atmosphere where none of them knew what was happening between their parents.

Roiphe sifts through mountains of material to create vivid depictions of each marriage from multiple perspectives.  While it’s true that no one will ever really know what happens behind closed doors, Roiphe is able to take the volumes of letters, diaries, and essays written by these people to craft tantalizing glimpses of what it must have been like to feel that the world was new and the rules waited to be written.

My Confederate Kinfolk

December 9th, 2009

My Confederate KinfolkIn My Confederate Kinfolk: A Twenty-First Century Freedwoman Discovers Her Roots, novelist Thulani Davis begins digging into her family history by carefully looking through a photo album and short memoir left to her by her grandmother.  What begins as an ordinary genealogical exercise ends with an incredible story of life during the Civil War and Reconstruction.  Davis expertly shapes her private family history into an exploration of what it means to be black and white in America.

Davis opens the book with her grandmother, Georgia Campbell Neal, who died in 1971.  Near the end of her life, Neal began to write the story of her parents, Chloe Tarrant Curry, a former slave, and Will Campbell, a white farmer in Yazoo City, Mississippi.  The two met in the 1870s, when Chloe was married to James Curry, another former slave.  Neal tentatively titled her memoir by the nickname she was given in childhood: “Chloe’s White Child.”  In researching and writing about her great-grandparents, Thulani Davis attempts to learn about a past that just wasn’t talked about in her family, and just isn’t talked about in most of our families:

My Confederate Kinfolk shares with the reader some of this intimacy of friend and foe, of slaveholder and slave, of freedwoman and employer.  I have attempted to look at the communities to which people belonged: overlapping communities of choice, communities of circumstance, and communities of coercion.

In telling our stories of family history and ultimately, American history, most of us focus on our communities of choice.  In my own family, we proudly repeat the story of a distant relation who stowed away from England to start a new life in America.  We love the idea of starting over, moving West, seizing the new opportunity.  In my family, we know nothing of my relative’s life in England.  All that has been preserved is that he came to America for a fresh start.  In a strange coincidence, Thulani Davis’s great-grandfather is part of the family who founded Springfield, Missouri, the city I claim as my hometown.  Growing up, we schoolchildren dutifully learned about the brave pioneers who came to Missouri to settle near a spring.  Fed on a steady diet of Little House on the Prairie, I looked at the Campbells and their first log cabin and imagined a tiny family, cut off from other relations, struggling to make a new life for themselves in the wilderness.

Imagine my surprise to see the Campbells through Thulani Davis’s story.  No longer a tiny family rolling across the hills in a covered wagon, the Campbells were part of a large family of slave-holders with plantations in Tennessee, Mississippi, and Texas.  They bred horses in Missouri which they sold to Southern markets.  The sons all fought as Confederates during the Civil War.  Their wealth and prominence came not only from their own hard work but from the coercion of hundreds of African Americans.  All of this has been edited out of our town’s official history in a way that is typical: it just wasn’t said.  Likewise, the Campbells were edited out of Davis’s family story.  Growing up, her family instilled in her the struggles and the triumphs of her black family.  The white ancestors, part of those communities of coercion, just weren’t talked about.  In both instances, all the elisions and silences leave us with only a partial understanding of who we are and where we came from.  Davis’s work is so important because she is willing to write about what has been left unsaid; her work gives all of us, black and white, a better understanding of our interconnected past.

Anne Frank: The Book, The Life, The Afterlife

November 18th, 2009

Anne

What is it about Anne Frank? I bet that most avid readers have read Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl at some point in their lives.  If they didn’t read the book, perhaps they read the play in school or saw the film version.  However one first encounters Anne, she leaves an indelible mark.  In her new book, Anne Frank: The Book, The Life, The Afterlife, Francine Prose is determined to figure out why Anne’s diary remains so compelling.

Prose’s book is written in four sections: The Life, The Book, The Afterlife, and Anne Frank in the Schools.  Almost everyone knows the basic facts: Anne Frank was a thirteen-year old girl living in Amsterdam, who received a diary for her birthday.  What begins as an ordinary diary, named “Kitty,” turns into one of the most memorable documents of the Holocaust.  Anne, her family, and three other Jews hid from the Nazis in an annex to her father’s office building.  They spent just over two years in hiding, aided by several Dutch “helpers.”  Just as the war neared its end, they were betrayed, arrested, and deported.  Everyone, except Otto Frank, died in the concentration camps.  Anne and her sister died at Bergen-Belsen; Anne was just fifteen years old.

Prose impressively conveys Anne’s life and the journey of her book after World War II, surely one of the most compelling stories of rejection and publication in the twentieth century.  Her central argument is that we should respect Anne as an extremely gifted writer.  She explains that Anne and the others heard a radio broadcast in the spring of 1944 calling for “ordinary documents” of Dutch life during the war to be archived after the war.  Immediately, the people in the Annex thought of Anne’s diary.  From the spring of 1944 until everyone’s arrest in August 1944, Anne rewrote much of her diary with the idea of publishing it as “The Secret Annex.”

Prose meticulously compares Anne’s original version with her rewrites and the edits her father makes to argue for Anne’s craft.  We all remember the diary so well not only because of the extraordinary situation of its creation but also because of the extraordinary talent of its author. Prose’s book is most interesting when she is comparing the versions and demonstrating how Anne’s revisions brought nuanced character description and needed context to the diary of a young girl.

In the section titled “The Afterlife,” Prose describes the making of the play and the film and the shortcomings of both.  She argues that both so thoroughly Americanize Anne that all we seem to remember is the line about “the good” Anne sees in everyone.  Still, Prose concedes that both probably kept the book in print. Without the play and the film, Frank’s diary might never have become a classic in schools. Prose ends with an inspiring reminiscence of her own experience teaching the book at Bard College.

Like many who love Anne’s work, I came to it in school, in eighth grade.  We had a brief excerpt of the play in our textbook.  That lead me to check and re-check the full play out from our local library.  Home alone in the afternoons, I’d create my sets out of our living room furniture and act away.  As I was just discovering the allure of boys, I particularly loved to act out the scenes with Peter.  Like most teens, I was drawn to Anne’s ability to capture all the difficulty of adolescence.  I’m pretty sure that I at least started the actual diary, but, to be honest, I’m not sure that I ever finished it.  Now, having read Prose’s book, I plan to go back and read the original as soon as possible.

Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar

October 30th, 2009

So, fellow readers, do you remember a time when you knew that you were a hopeless bookworm?

For me, it happened in college.  When I completed my final exam for the semester, do you know how I treated myself?  Not with a big pitcher of beer or a large pizza.  No, I went to the university bookstore and bought all my books for the next semester. I know, in retrospect, I sound an awful lot like Hermione in Harry Potter.  But, there was something about walking up and down the rows of books, looking over what I would read next semester.  While this semester, I may have skated by or not learned enough or had boring classes, next semester, it would all be different.  Those books represented possibility.

Even though I’m a little older and wiser these days, I still love to visit university bookstores.  I like to check out what others are teaching, and I still wonder if I’ll find something really clever or interesting.  A few weeks ago, while on a visit to Virginia State University, I did find a fun book on the textbook shelves: Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar: Understanding Philosophy through Jokes, by Thomas Cathcart and Daniel Klein. This clever little volume takes philosophical concepts like “empiricism” or “post hoc ergo propter hoc,” gives a brief summary, and illustrates the concept with a joke.  Some of the jokes are real howlers, but they do help illuminate the idea.

For example, while explaining Plato’s ideal virtues of the individual in The Republic, the authors briefly define Wisdom as Plato’s understanding of “the Idea of the Good.”  Then, they offer this joke:

At a meeting of the college faculty, an angel suddenly appears and tells the head of the philosophy department, “I will grant you whichever of three blessings you choose: Wisdom, Beauty — or ten million dollars.”

Immediately, the professor chooses Wisdom.

There is a flash of lightning, and the professor appears transformed, but he just sits there, staring down at the table.

One of his colleagues whispers, “Say something.”

The professor says, “I should have taken the money.”

OK, perhaps not the funniest joke ever, but it does drive home the importance of Wisdom to Plato, since that’s what the professor immediately chooses.

If you’re looking to brush up on philosophy or struggling through a course now, I think this is a great volume to dip into once in a while.

Now, I want to know, when did you know that you were a bookworm?  :)

The Man Who Loved Books Too Much

October 28th, 2009

man who loved books too muchDuring my M.A. program, each year we were entertained by a wealthy lawyer who collected books.  He had built an extra wing onto his house where he created a picture-perfect two-story library. There were leather wingback chairs, a fireplace, glass display cases, and bookcases lined up library-style.   Of course, the second-floor balcony wrapped all the way around the room, and there was one of those clever little ladders you could use to reach the upper bookcases.

After a reading on campus, all the graduate students and professors duly caravaned out to his house for wine, cheese, and the appropriate “ooh” and “ahh” hour.  I have to admit that the whole thing felt a little soulless.  While I gathered that I was supposed to be impressed by the first editions and the rare letters, nothing about his library invited me to curl up with a good book.  Instead, I felt like I was in a gigantic trophy case.   Swap all the books out for mounted deer and bear heads, and the room would have felt more fitting.

That was my first, and only, introduction to the world of rare-book collecting.  Allison Hoover Bartlett’s new book, The Man Who Loved Books Too Much, pretty much reinforces my first impression.  There’s a world of difference between readers and collectors, though occasionally the two overlap.  Bartlett delves into the quirks and personalities of the rare-book world.  Like any sub-culture, it has some very interesting people, some charmers, and some con-men. She focuses on John Charles Gilkey, whose passion for rare-books leads him to a life of crime.  While the theft of rare books doesn’t quite lead to a masterpiece like In Cold Blood (which Bartlett clearly admires), it does make for interesting reading. I learned a few tid-bits, and now know much more about credit card fraud.

I must admit that I won’t be collecting rare books anytime soon, but I had fun reading all about it.  So, fellow bloggers, do any of you collect rare books?  If so, what’s most enjoyable about it?